I wrote: > So for clarity's sake: first suitable format among these: > Time: 59.999 ms > Time: 121.999 ms (2:01.999) > Time: 10921.999 ms (3:02:01.999) > Time: 356521.999 ms (4 3:02:01.999)
Sorry, that probably added no clarity at all, I was confusing
seconds with milliseconds in the example values :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
