On September 4, 2016 6:33:30 PM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2016-09-04 21:09:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Hm, couldn't we do that automatically? At least in the case where >only >>> one base-version script is available? > >> You mean determining the baseversion? Hm, yes, that might work. But >I'm >> not sure how much we can rely on no earlier scripts being already >> installed or such. Seems like a problem you'd possibly only encounter >in >> the field or dirty development environments. > >Actually, why would we care? Pick one, with some tiebreaker rules >(shortest update path, for starters).
Fair point. > I think nearly all of the >infrastructure for this is already there in extension.c. Yes, it doesn't sound very hard... Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
