On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Pavan Deolasee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This thread started a year ago, different people contributed various >> patches, some of which already got committed. Can someone please post a >> summary of this thread, so that it's a bit more clear what needs >> review/testing, what are the main open questions and so on? >> >> I'm interested in doing some tests on the hardware I have available, but >> I'm not willing spending my time untangling the discussion. >> > > I signed up for reviewing this patch. But as Amit explained later, there are > two different and independent implementations to solve the problem. Since > Tomas has volunteered to do some benchmarking, I guess I should wait for the > results because that might influence which approach we choose. > > Does that sound correct? >
Sounds correct to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
