On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:58:28 +0530
Mithun Cy <mithun...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Now if only one host is in connection string and it ask for read_write
> connection(connect to master) I mean read_only is set 0 explicitly.
> With above logic we will allow it to connect to standby?. I still
> think psql connection to standby should be handled by changing the
> default value of readonly to 1 (which means connect to any).
It would definitely be more logical, but I haven't found easy way to do
it. May be I should return to this place and rethink. I don't like and
idea to explicitely ignore connection string parameter due to some
condition.
Really, I think, test for replication connection can be either
removed from this part of code now.
> Thinking
> further probably replacing readonly parameter with
> targetServerType=any|master (with default being any) should clear
> some confusions and bring consistency since same is used in JDBC
> multi host connection string.
It seems that in this context change readonly=0|1 to
targetServerType=any|master makes sense.
> 2)
> @@ -1460,33 +1538,80 @@ connectDBStart(PGconn *conn)
> portstr,
> (int) (UNIXSOCK_PATH_BUFLEN - 1));
> conn->options_valid = false;
> + free(nodes->port);
>
> nodes->port was not allocated at this point.
>
I'll recheck it.
--
Victor Wagner <vi...@wagner.pp.ru>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
