On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> On 06 Sep 2016, at 04:41, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This overlaps with TwoPhaseGetGXact but I'd rather keep both things >> separated: it does not seem worth complicating the existing interface, >> and putting that in cache during recovery has no meaning. > > Oh, I was preparing new version of patch, after fresh look on it. Probably, I > should > said that in this topic. I’ve found a bug in sub transaction handling and now > working > on fix.
What's the problem actually? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
