Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Indeed, and the query field does not have much more meaning for a WAL
> sender. So I'd propose the attached for 9.6 and HEAD. I have thought
> about reporting that to pgstat in StartReplication(), but as there is
> some error handling there I'd think that WalSndLoop() is a better
> place to call pgstat_report_activity, as per the attached.
As long as it's a fixed string there's no reason to set it repeatedly,
so this placement looks fine for now. We can reconsider when/if we
make it variable and decide what is going to drive it.
On reflection, maybe s/walsender/WAL sender/? It doesn't look like
we really use the word "walsender" in user-facing docs.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
