Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On September 13, 2016 9:07:35 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd like to go ahead and push this, since it's a necessary prerequisite
>> for either approach we might adopt for the rest of the patch series,
>> and the improved error reporting and avoidance of expensive
>> expression_returns_set searches make it a win IMO even if we were not
>> planning to do anything more with SRFs.
> Can't look are the code just now, on my way to the airport for pgopen, but
> the idea sounds good to me.
OK, I went ahead and pushed it. We can tweak later if needed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
