On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's probably wrong to worry that an array-of-arrays is going > to be meaningfully slower than a single array here. It's basically > costing you some small number of additional memory references per > tuple, which I suspect isn't all that relevant for a bulk operation > that does I/O, writes WAL, locks buffers, etc.
This analysis makes perfect sense to me. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
