On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/12/16 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, there was just a kerfuffle about spelling things like this
>> "--no-clean" etc. I wasn't on board with removing existing spellings,
>> but surely all newly added switches should use the "no-" spelling?
>
> This is supposed to be parallel to initdb's option. So if we rename or
> migrate the one in initdb, then we can just hard-rename this one. But
> until that is decided, it seems better to keep it the same as initdb has
> right now.
PostgresNode.pm had better use the new --noclean option in its calls,
the new default is not useful for debugging. Please see attached.
--
Michael
diff --git a/src/test/perl/PostgresNode.pm b/src/test/perl/PostgresNode.pm
index fede1e6..0b8c8e6 100644
--- a/src/test/perl/PostgresNode.pm
+++ b/src/test/perl/PostgresNode.pm
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ sub backup
print "# Taking pg_basebackup $backup_name from node \"$name\"\n";
TestLib::system_or_bail('pg_basebackup', '-D', $backup_path, '-p', $port,
- '-x');
+ '-x', '--noclean');
print "# Backup finished\n";
}
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
