On 2016-09-19 15:10:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Personally, I find the results so far posted on this thread thoroughly > unimpressive. I acknowledge that Dilip's results appear to show that > in a best-case scenario these patches produce a rather large gain. > However, that gain seems to happen in a completely contrived scenario: > astronomical client counts, unlogged tables, and a test script that > maximizes pressure on CLogControlLock. If you have to work that hard > to find a big win, and tests under more reasonable conditions show no > benefit, it's not clear to me that it's really worth the time we're > all spending benchmarking and reviewing this, or the risk of bugs, or > the damage to the SLRU abstraction layer. I think there's a very good > chance that we're better off moving on to projects that have a better > chance of helping in the real world.
+1 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
