Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> Oh, right, at the very last loop. I've never seen it need more than 1 loop
> so I didn't manage to hit that codepath :) But yeah, saving errno and
> restoring it on the other side of pg_usleep is probably a good idea.
Right. On a larger scale --- I'm too uncaffeinated to figure out whether
this is the code path taken for the initially user-supplied file name.
But it would be unfriendly if when you fat-finger the command line
arguments, it takes 5 seconds for pg_xlogdump to tell you so. Maybe
the looping behavior should only happen on non-first file access.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
