On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > Hmm, yeah, that'd be nice to fix. I'd like to see a patch specifically to > fix that. I'm not convinced that we need all the complications of this > patch, to get that fixed. (In particular, indexam's still wouldn't need to > care about the different between CHECK_UNIQUE_PARTIAL and > CHECK_UNIQUE_SPECULATIVE, I think.)
But you are convinced that everything else I describe would do it? -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
