Hi,
On 2015-09-07 17:05:10 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > I feel like I remember hearing about this before but I can't find any > mention of it in my mail archives. It seems pretty simple to add > support for LLVM's Address Sanitizer (asan) by using the hooks we > already have for valgrind. Any plans to pick this up again? > In fact I think this would actually be sufficient. I'm not sure what > the MEMPOOL valgrind stuff is though. I don't think it's relevant to > address sanitizer which only tracks references to free'd or > unallocated pointers. It'd be nice to add msan support, so uninitialized accesses are also tracked. (oh, you suggest that below) I vote for renaming the VALGRIND names etc. to something more tool-neutral. I think it's going to be too confusing otherwise. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
