On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> At Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:00:15 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >> <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in >> <20160930.140015.150178454.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> I don't see no problem in setting progressAt in XLogInsertRecord. >>> But I doubt GetProgressRecPtr is harmful, especially when >> >> But I suspect that GetProgressRecPtr could be harmful. > > Well, you can maximize its effects by doing NUM_XLOGINSERT_LOCKS == > nproc and reducing checkpoint_timeout. That's what I did but..
Note: I am moving this patch to next CF. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
