On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, so I have done a review of this patch keeping that in mind as > that's the consensus. I am still getting familiar with the code...
Returned with feedback for now. This just needs polishing so feel free to move it to the next CF once you have a new patch. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
