At Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:14:23 +0900, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote in <cab7npqsf8dbndokt5der6fpzdusuxn_g7uwnpqun_a_sewb...@mail.gmail.com> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for no response, but, the answer is yes. We could be able > > to avoid the problem by managing execution state for every > > node. But it needs an additional flag in *State structs and > > manipulating on the way shuttling up and down around the > > execution tree. > > Moved to next CF.
Thank you. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
