On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote
> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE.  Does the following look good or am I still
>> missing something?
>
> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine.

I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched
the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs
review".
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to