On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane > FWIW, I'm pretty much -1 on messing with the timing of the socket close >> actions. I broke that once within recent memory, so maybe I'm gun-shy, >> but I think that the odds of unpleasant side effects greatly outweigh any >> likely benefit there. > > I couldn't find any relevant mails in pgsql-hackers. I found no problem with > the attached patch. Do you think this is OK?
I have no opinion on this patch, because I haven't reviewed it, but note recent commit 3b90e38c5d592ea8ec8236287dd5c749fc041728, which appears to be semi-related. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
