On 10/19/2016 02:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 10/19/2016 02:29 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 10/19/2016 01:07 PM, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
Anyways, we seem good to go with the patch.
Ok, committed. Thanks for the analysis!
Oh, forgot that this needs to be backported, of course. Will do that
shortly...
Done.
This didn't include anything to cope with an already-corrupt FSM, BTW.
Do we still want to try something for that? I think it's good enough if
we prevent the FSM corruption from happening, but not sure what the
consensus on that might be..
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
