Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Jim Nasby wrote: >> It occurs to me that it might be worth embedding the relation name in the >> free space of the first block. Most people would never notice the missing 64 >> bytes, but it would be incredibly helpful in cases like this...
> Agreed. The problem is how to install it without breaking pg_upgrade. Well, that's the first problem. The second problem is how to cope with RENAME TABLE. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers