On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Rushabh Lathia
> <rushabh.lat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I performed basic test with patch,
>>
>> a) patch get applied cleanly on latest source,
>> b) able to build documentation cleanly.
>>
>> Marking this as ready for committer.
>
> Oops, incorrect patch... I am moving it to next CF. Discussion can
> continue there.

I'm not interested in committing this patch.  I don't believe it is an
improvement on what we've got today.

Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to