On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > If my understanding is right, then the changes proposed by you as > below is not what is intended here. I think you need to do something > as I have mentioned above.
Ah OK I have spotted the subtility; - 0 means update minRecoveryPoint to the LSN *passed* by the caller - 1 means update minRecoveryPoint to the *latest replayed* LSN and not the one of the caller But if we do so that would mean an extra update of the control file for nothing in CreateRestartPoint(), and that serves nothing. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
