Hi Tom, On 2016-09-14 19:28:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2016-09-12 19:35:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Anyway I'll draft a prototype and then we can compare. > > > Ok, cool. > > Here's a draft patch that is just meant to investigate what the planner > changes might look like if we do it in the pipelined-result way. > Accordingly, I didn't touch the executor, but just had it emit regular > Result nodes for SRF-execution steps. However, the SRFs are all > guaranteed to appear at top level of their respective tlists, so that > those Results could be replaced with something that works like > nodeFunctionscan.
> So I think we should continue investigating this way of doing things. > I'll try to take a look at the executor end of it tomorrow. However > I'm leaving Friday for a week's vacation, and may not have anything to > show before that. Are you planning to work on the execution side of things? I otherwise can take a stab... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
