On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> While reviewing code coverage in pltcl, I uncovered a bug in trigger
> function return handling. If you returned the munged name of a dropped
> column, that would silently be ignored. It would be unusual to hit this,
> since dropped columns end up with names like ".......pg.dropped.2.......",
> but since that's still a legitimate name for a column silently ignoring it
> seems rather bogus.

It seems to me that this patch breaks $TG_relatts and what existing
applications would except from it:
      <varlistentry>
       <term><varname>$TG_relatts</varname></term>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         A Tcl list of the table column names, prefixed with an empty list
         element. So looking up a column name in the list with
<application>Tcl</>'s
         <function>lsearch</> command returns the element's number starting
         with 1 for the first column, the same way the columns are customarily
         numbered in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>.  (Empty list
         elements also appear in the positions of columns that have been
         dropped, so that the attribute numbering is correct for columns
         to their right.)
        </para>
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>
As this is a behavior present since 2004, it does not sound wise to change it.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to