Hi Takayuki-san,
IMHO, I think we could remove third paragraph completely and
generalised starting of second paragraph, somewhat looks likes as
follow:
<para>
- If you have a dedicated database server with 1GB or more of RAM, a
- reasonable starting value for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> is 25%
- of the memory in your system. There are some workloads where even
+ A reasonable starting value for
<varname>shared_buffers</varname> is 25%
+ of the RAM in your system. There are some workloads where even
large settings for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> are effective, but
because <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> also relies on the
operating system cache, it is unlikely that an allocation of more than
I may be wrong here, would like know your and/or community's thought
on this. Thanks.
Regards,
Amul Sul
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
