On 21 October 2016 at 19:38, Vladimir Gordiychuk <fol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Craig, Andres what do you thinks about previous message?
I haven't had a chance to look further to be honest. Since a downstream disconnect works, though it's ugly, it's not something I can justify spending a lot of time on, and I already did spend a lot on it in patch review/updating/testing etc. I don't know what Andres wants, but I think CopyFail with ERRCODE_QUERY_CANCELED is fine. As for plugins that collect changes in memory and only send them on commit, I'd call them "broken". Not an interesting case IMO. Don't do that. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
