On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I don't think we need "named constants", especially not >>> manually-maintained ones. The thing that would help in pg_proc.h is for >>> numeric type OIDs to be replaced by type names. We talked awhile back >>> about introducing some sort of preprocessing step that would allow doing >>> that --- ie, it would look into some precursor file for pg_type.h and >>> extract the appropriate OID automatically. I'm too tired to go find the >>> thread right now, but it was mostly about building the long-DATA-lines >>> representation from something easier to edit. > >> You mean that I guess: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4d191a530911041228v621286a7q6a98d9ab8a2ed...@mail.gmail.com > > Hmm, that's from 2009. I thought I remembered something much more recent, > like last year or so.
This perhaps: * Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita * https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAOjayEfKBL-_Q9m3Jsv6V-mK1q8h%3Dca5Hm0fecXGxZUhPDN9BA%40mail.gmail.com Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
