On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11/7/16 1:13 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: >> Yes, I agree that default zone is the main use case of the original thread. >> From the RFC 4007, the default zone is used for the global addresses, >> This may be the main use case with zone id. How about currently just >> ignoring it and store the actual IP address with the attached patch and >> handle the rest of the actual zone id support later once the it gets >> properly standardized? > > Well, according to the RFC, the default zone is 0 "typically", which is > a very weak requirement. So just ignoring it is probably also not right. > > So far we have only heard one use case for any of this, which is someone > wanting to store ::1%0, which is not even a valid address according to > that same RFC. So this is all on very weak ground. > > I think we should just forget about this. It's all a bit too dubious.
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
