From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> OK. I agree that's a problem. However, your patch adds zero new comment
> text while removing some existing comments, so I can't easily tell how it
> solves that problem or whether it does so correctly. Even if I were smart
> enough to figure it out, I wouldn't want to rely on the next person also
> being that smart. This is obviously a subtle problem in tricky code, so
> a clear explanation of the fix seems like a very good idea.
The comment describes what the code is trying to achieve. Actually, I just
imitated the code and comment of later major releases. The only difference
between later releases and my patch (for 9.2) is whether the state is stored in
XLogReaderStruct or as global variables. Below is the comment from 9.6, where
the second paragraph describes what the two nested if conditions mean. The
removed comment lines are what became irrelevant, which is also not present in
later major releases.
/*
* Since child timelines are always assigned a TLI greater than their
* immediate parent's TLI, we should never see TLI go backwards across
* successive pages of a consistent WAL sequence.
*
* Sometimes we re-read a segment that's already been (partially) read.
So
* we only verify TLIs for pages that are later than the last remembered
* LSN.
*/
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
