On 2016-11-09 12:55:51 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > The system will let you set the "user_catalog_table" reloption to "true" > > on a materialized view. Is this sensible, or is it a bug caused by the > > fact that reloptions.c fails to distinguish matviews from heaps at all? > > > > If it is sensible, then I broke it in e3e66d8a9 ... > > I can understand what that combination of opens would mean from a > semantic point of view, so I don't think it's insensible. However, it > doesn't seem like an important combination to support, and I suspect > that the fact that we did was accidental.
I don't see it as being important either. I suspect we intentionally didn't exclude it, but less because of a use-case and more because there didn't seem to be a need to. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
