On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the patch. This shows a very good performance improvement. >> >> > Thank you. Can you please share the benchmark you ran, results and > observations? > I just ran a performance test on my laptop with minimal configuration, it didn't show much improvement, currently I don't have access to a big machine to test the performance. > I started reviewing the patch, during this process and I ran the regression >> test on the WARM patch. I observed a failure in create_index test. >> This may be a bug in code or expected that needs to be corrected. >> > > Can you please share the diff? I ran regression after applying patch on > the current master and did not find any change? Does it happen consistently? > Yes, it is happening consistently. I ran the make installcheck. Attached the regression.diffs file with the failed test. I applied the previous warm patch on this commit - e3e66d8a9813d22c2aa027d8f373a96d4d4c1b15 Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia
regression.diffs
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
