On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> > wrote: > >> Is there a reason why we don't log which relation triggered the > >> snapshot too old error when it happens? > > > I would probably not want to mess with the text of the error itself, > > in case any client-side software bases recovery on that rather than > > the SQLSTATE value; > > Any such code is broken on its face because of localization. > Perhaps including the relname in the main message would make it unduly > long, but if not I'd vote for doing it that way.
+1 for relname in the main message. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
