On 11/18/16 12:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > My feeling is that 82233ce7e has obsoleted all of the proposals made so > far in this thread, and that we should reject them all.
Yes, it seems that very similar concerns were already addressed there. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
