Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the report! Looks like the serialization code has overlooked
>> the fact that string-valued GUCs can be NULL. Surprising we didn't
>> find that before ...
> Why do we allow this, anyway?
I think it simplifies some initialization cases. Not sure how hard
it would be to remove that. But this isn't the first such bug ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
