On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > So, all my original concern were cleared.
Cool. Perhaps this could be marked as ready for committer then? > The last one is > resetting by a checkpointer restart.. I'd like to remove that if > Andres agrees. Could you clarify this point? v18 makes sure that the last segment switch stays in shared memory so as we could still skip the activity of archive_timeout correctly. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
