On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think that you should skip it in the wraparound case, because > it might be one of the temp tables that is threatening wraparound. > > I've committed the patch after doing some work on the comments.
OK, thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
