On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:12:47AM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 11/27/16 12:16 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:24:36 -0400 > > Make numeric form of PG version number readily available in Makefiles. > > If you don't want to wait for that,
I wonder whether a back-patch to 9.2 with that would be accepted... > you can use [1] in shell I'd like to make as few assumptions about build environments as I can. I know for sure that people are building my things on platforms like Windows that I have no way to test, but don't wish to break. > or Make to accomplish something similar. Looks like there is a > dotted MAJORVERSION variable going back to at least 9.1, Good to know. I guess I can rely on there being a GNU make...at least for now. > so I could have used that instead of PGVERSION on line 51. > 1: https://github.com/decibel/pgxntool/blob/master/base.mk#L47-L56 Thanks for sharing :) Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
