On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote: > I also did a debug build with 1+2+4 that came in at 84 μs/iteration.
Moved to next CF. Christian, perhaps this patch should have an extra round of reviews? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
