On 29/11/16 07:37, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > 2016-11-29 7:34 GMT+01:00 Christian Convey <christian.con...@gmail.com > <mailto:christian.con...@gmail.com>>: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Pavel Stehule > <pavel.steh...@gmail.com <mailto:pavel.steh...@gmail.com>>wrote: > > We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath - > it is better for user, because have to learn only one language. > > > I'm not sure I understand. > > Are you suggesting that we use XPath, not JSONPath, as our language > for json-path expressions? > > > surely not. > > follow ANSI/SQL :) >
Just to add to this, the SQL/JSON proposals I've seen so far, and what Oracle, MSSQL and Teradata chose to implement already is basically subset of jsonpath (some proposals/implementations also include lax/strict prefix keyword on top of that). I think that should give us some hint on what the base functionality should look like. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers