On Tuesday, November 22, 2016, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > On 11/17/16 12:30 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > >> No, I'm not recommending a higher value, but just removing the doubtful > sentences of 512MB upper limit. The advantage is that eliminating this > sentence will make a chance for users to try best setting. > > > > I think this is a good point. The information is clearly > > wrong/outdated. We have no new better information, but we should remove > > misleading outdated advice and let users find new advice. Basically, > > this just puts Windows on par with other platforms with regard to > > shared_buffers tuning, doesn't it? > > > > I'm inclined to commit the original patch if there are no objections. > > +1. > > +1. In light of the further data that's in, my earlier objection is withdrawn :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
