On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> check-world isn't a magic bullet. > >> No, but deliberately leaving things out that could be run isn't >> helping anything either. > > Tests that open security holes while running aren't in my list of "things > that could be run automatically".
If we create a new target that runs them automatically, you don't have to use it. > In any case, you're in a poor position to whine about this given that > parallel query is entirely unamenable to automated testing, and you've > resisted past proposals for improving that situation. Really? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
