On 12/2/16 9:24 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote:
In order for me to understand how high the bar has been set, can you
(Robert/Tom mostly, but I welcome any responses) explain what you mean by
"full-blown expression language"? What constructs must it include, etc?
I mostly mean it should be based on flex and bison, not "this is so
simple I can just hand-roll it". I don't think it has much chance of
staying that simple.
It might be worth looking at other simplistic languages for guidance.
bash comes to mind, though there's GPL issues there. csh/tcsh don't have
those problems, and perhaps some of their grammar could be stolen.
I find it interesting that this is kind of the opposite problem that
most pl's face: how to fit the database access paradigm into the
language with the minimal amount of extra effort for users.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/bin/csh/?only_with_tag=MAIN
https://github.com/tcsh-org/tcsh
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
