On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Micheal, I need your help in closing the commitfest.
And done. Thanks for doing this work! I was ready to use my CF vacuum cleaner as need be, but that does not seem to be needed. > I closed the commitfest using the following assumptions. > > Moved to next CF with needs review. > 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest > 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest. > > Moved to next CF with waiting on author: > 1. Patch doesn't apply to HEAD, but didn't receive any feedback. > > Returned with feedback: > 1. Patch received feedback, but author hasn't responded yet. > 2. Author is expected to share an updated patch. > > Rejected: > 1. Any -1 from committer to the approach of the patch All that sounds fair to me. > May be these assumptions needs to be updated, as this is the first > time as CFM for me. > > I definitely may missed judging the current state of the patch. Please feel > free to update the actual status. That's definitely up to the authors and reviewers to double-check what has been done and correct anything they think is not. And far as I can see you have done an admirable work in keeping it on tracks, so huge +1 from me. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
