Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yikes. This patch has certainly had a lot of review, but it has lots
> of basic inconsistencies with PostgreSQL coding style, which one would
> think somebody would have noticed by now, and there are multiple
> places where the logic seems to do in a complicated way something that
> could be done significantly more simply. I don't have any objection
> to the basic idea of this patch, but it's got to look and feel like
> the surrounding PostgreSQL code. And not be unnecessarily
> complicated.
A lot of the code-formatting issues could probably be fixed by running it
through pgindent. Also, when you are starting from code that was written
with little regard for Postgres layout conventions, it's a really good
idea to see what pgindent will do to it, because it might not look very
nice afterwards.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
