On 12 December 2016 at 00:36, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Craig Ringer > <craig.rin...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> >>>> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this >>>> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen >>>> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't >>>> reach consistency yet. >>> >>> Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct. >> >> Attached no patch second time? > > I see an attachment, and it shows in the archives. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aee1d499-e3ca-e091-56da-1ee6a47741c8%402ndquadrant.com
Sorry for the noise, apparently my phone's mail client was being dense. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
