On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > And now I'm noticing that Michael Paquier previously started a thread > on this problem which I failed to note before starting this one: > > http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqSYN05rGsYCTahxTz+2hBikh7=m+hr2JTXaZv_Ei=q...@mail.gmail.com
Yes. I already had a look at what could be done to expose the auxiliary processes in a system view with a set of proposals, though I am not sure what would be better. It would be better to move the discussion on this thread in my opinion, we are tracking down a solution for a new problem. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
