On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> When the number of sync standbys is set to 0 in s_s_names, the assersion >> failure happens as follows. This means that current multiple syncrep code >> assumes that the num of sync standbys must be greater than 0. But we forgot >> to forbid users from setting that num to 0. This is an oversight in multiple >> syncrep patch (so my fault...). Attached patch forbits that. > > Ooops. Patch looks fine to me.
Thanks for the review! Pushed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
