On 2016-12-16 10:12:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've got no problem with that at all, but I want to unbreak things > > more or less immediately and then you/we can further improve it later. > > Committed
Thanks. Although "Fix drastic slowdown when ..." or so might have been a less confusing commit message ;) > , although I realize now that doesn't fix Dilip's problem, > only my (somewhat different) problem. Indeed. And the fix for Dilip's thing also fixes your issue, albeit what you committed still helps noticeably (even with the old hashtable). > To fix his issue, we need something like your 0001. Are you going to > polish that up soon here? Yes. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
