Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > >>> If we were going to do anything about this, > >>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance. > > > >> Go for it. > > > >> Let's also remove the table* syntax then. > > > > Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose? > > > > We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period. > > I'm less concerned about that for GUCs. > > I agree. Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal > amount of the supporting infrastructure.
Any particular reason not to change inhOpt to be a simple boolean, and remove the enum? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
