2016-12-26 19:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-12-26 18:20 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr>: > >> >> >> >> And how would it interact with some "fully persistent/shared" variables? >> >> >> >> I have not any use case for this. I don't know about any similar feature >> in other database systems. Oracle uses dbms_pipe or dbms_alert for >> interprocess communication. >> >> I am thinking so it is possible to implement. If it is not ACID, then it >> can work as custom statistic counters. If it should be ACID? Then is better >> to use table. What I know, now is preferred share nothing design in >> parallel systems - so for me, it looks like little bit dangerous feature - >> and I see only one use case - custom statistics - where possible race >> condition is not hard issue. >> >> But I don't plan to implement it in first stage. There should be strong >> use case for implementing any complex feature in shared memory. But any >> implementation doesn't breaking to implement it in feature. >> > for custom statistic some extension based on bg worker can be better - sharing variables are risk of race conditions - and developers are people only.
I have not a clean opinion about this - the implementation should not be hard, but I am not sure if this gun I would to give to users. Regards Pavel > >> Regards >> >> Pavel >> >> >> -- >> Fabien. > > >
